![]() ![]() “The ThunderCats have been a love of mine since I can remember and the intro is something I thought would be a fun challenge to recreate and keep my interest while I was learning the software,” Booth wrote in the video’s description. Booth also posted a separate video in which there is a split between the cartoon intro and his CG intro to show it is a shot-for-shot remake. (Also I have no idea what the actual bitrate Youtube is throwing out for 8k.ThunderCats, Ho! A fan of the classic ’80s cartoon ThunderCats (which also had a 2011 reboot) recently recreated the show’s intro in full CG - and it’s masterful.Ī little more than a week old, the YouTube video by Mike Booth has more than 600,000 views. It should be to make a video that works well on the current tech platforms (which is 4k at best) and make it look like a better version over what a standard resize/scale would do.Ĭause really, with a clean source I could probably do better with nothing more than Gigapixel and Avisynth. The end goal of these sort of projects shouldn’t be to give you a true 8k experience, cause that’s not possible. Even 1080p today looks better than it did 20 years ago just because camera sensor technology has progressed that much. There is always going to be a big difference between filming something in +4k, taking an analog source and capturing it in +4k, and using a computer to upscale to +4k. It’s overly sharp, yet the edges and lines are soft and distorted. He looked at me like I grew a second head. I asked the sales guy to flat line a couple of them, zero out the bass, mid, and treble and turn off any of the enhancements. Back in the late 90’s I was at Circuit City trying to pick out a new aftermarket CD player for my car. And then most of them are playing some type of “stock” promotional footage that is optimized to the TV. All of them have the brightness, contrast, and saturation blown completely out. It’s like going to Best Buy and viewing TV’s. Second, I think the vast majority of people have a very skewed idea of what is supposed to look good. ![]() ![]() Worst case they are taking some over compressed sd res video they found on the net and started there. More than likely someone is working from a broadcast tape of some sort (if they are lucky). If you could get the physical animation film or cells and then obtain a +4k scan of them you’d have a really really solid basis to clean up the source from. Not like that matters, it still looks like hot garbage. I didn’t even watch it until your comment. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |